I live in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and believe firmly in French Gastronomy. As often as is possible I host friends so that I may share my vision of fine living. It is a luxurious thing to sit around a table, glass of wine in hand and be positively thrilled at the mingled pleasures of good food, fine wine and the company of those you most care about. It is in the enjoyment of food and wine in the deliberately ritualized setting of the dinner table that we, as people, are at our best and the world makes the most sense. It is not meant to be a realm of snobs or bombasts. The raison d'être of the table, in my view, is to both have a good time and forge new connections with one's fellow human beings. It is at once a very serious and very frivolous pursuit. After all, without the stabilizing influence of culture (with food traditions filling an anchoring position on the same scope as language in such a broad term) the refinements of our militaries, economies, scientists, television networks and I know not what mean literally nothing.
My intention is to share my experiences at table. I try to put a great deal of thought to the meals I create so that the experience is a harmonious statement that is easy to grasp and yet offers a deep and profound level of pleasure for those willing to spare more than a passing thought for nourishment and lubrication. I will offer my basic template for a meal:
Aperitif- I like to offer something different than any other wine I am serving. this often means Champagne or other sparkling wine but I have also been ravished by barely sweet Vouvray or Riesling or a dry and vibrant fino sherry. The aperitif should literally be an appetite sharpener and should leave the palate unencumbered for the main body of the meal.
First Course- There are a nearly infinite variety of possibilities for this. I serve white wine with this so its compatibility with that drink is taken for granted. The scope of white wines allows for a great variety of preparations here. I most often find myself making a vegetable or seafood dish to accompany whichever wine is most suitable. If it's vegetables
á la grecque it may be a Chablis, a Pouilly-Fumé or perhaps a white Côtes du Rhône. A more powerful preparation, say, fish in a creamed sauce, would fit nicely with a white Burgundy, be it Poully-Fuissé, a Mâcon-Villages or a fine Côte d'Or. An important consideration is the following wine; it would be silly to precede a fine and venerable claret with a little and acid white wine just as it would be senseless to follow a beautiful Côte de Beaune premier cru with a rough and tumble red from the Rhône Valley. Just like everything else this course and its accompanying wine should fit into the overall harmony of the meal.
Second Course- This is the food climax. The "main course." To my mind that means meat. Whether a straightforward roast or a more involved assembly or braise this is the cornerstone of the meal. Garnishes and side dishes can often be kept to a minimum since the preceding course will often concern itself more thoroughly with vegetables. I often like to serve a starch at this point as relief for the meat. An assembly such as a blanquette de veau – poached veal breast served in a divinely creamed sauce over top fresh egg noodles – allows for a single commanding dish that cannot fail to garner admiration. Often this course will involve a joint of meat that requires disassembly, which is to say carving. A seemingly forgotten art, carving is a true joy for all involved. There is little as handsome as, say, a burnished roasted piece of meat brought table-side to be dispatched by a skilled hand and a sharp knife. The simplicity of a roast chicken, requiring little forethought or expertise, will be elevated when the whole bird is carved before the diners eyes; they become partcipants and part of the mysterious gap seperating the eater from the eaten is bridged. Please, try carving, do it in front of your friends, they won't mind if you mess up, I promise.
In terms of wine, this is, generally, red wine territory. I like to serve two red wines in a meal and this is the first opportunity. Meat has a marvelous affinity to red wines and when tasted together they can often soften each other; the meat will often be "finished" by a wine, I consider it the final seasoning of the dish, and the wine will open itself up more generously. The red here can be relatively simple and, ideally, should pave the way for the red to follow. It makes the most sense to have two reds of the same region or grape varietal and follow the simpler with the more venerable. For example a Mercurey from the Côte Chalonnaise (a lesser section of Burgundy) could precede a fine red from the Côte de Nuits (for many the summit of red Burgundy.) Another alternative is to serve the same wine or at least the same type and serve a younger version first to be followed by and older and (theoretically) more mature example.
Third Course- This is salad. A simple green salad. Nothing but fresh lettuces and herbs in a dressing made only of olive oil, vinegar, salt and pepper. The lettuces can be of any sort and a more interesting result is had when there are several varieties incorporated into the same salad. Herbs will compliment and the vinegar and oil should be more than decent; there is no subterfuge to hide behind here, they must be delicious on their own. The salad course may seem strange placed this late in the meal but it is often a revelation for those unused to eating in this fashion. That being said, it makes complete sense to serve a salad, whether comprising only lettuce or a more involved garnish, as a first course and forgo this dish. No wine is served here. Vinegar and wine do not agree and at any rate the wine that would most compliment a simple green salad (white) would create nothing but discord when placed between the two reds that surround it. This is the start of what I think of as the "denouement" of the meal, the last three courses forming a sort of arc that gently brings the meal to a conclusion. If done right the last three will also require little last minute effort by the cook and do nothing but extend the pleasure of dining.
Fourth Course- Cheeses. A platter of a few types of cheese, each different in character, is spectacular. I always accompany it with the best bread I can get and am every time in wonder at the miracle of cheese. The inclusion of a creamy, brie-like cheese will satisfy many a cheese lover and the inclusion of something firm and crumbly on the platter will only highlight the luxury of a runny cheese. I like to have at least three cheeses and the third is often a goat milk cheese, whether aged or fresh.
The main reason for the cheese course is, however wonderful the cheese may be, its wine. This is the red wine climax and the time to pull out the finest bottle you may muster. Because of this I find it important to select those cheeses which will not offend a fine wine nor assert their own character to the detriment of the wine. It is better to have delicate cheeses (which is not at all to say bland) and fully appreciate the wine than to risk destroying the wine with violent (and potentially scrumptious) examples. This means there are many cheeses I will not welcome to my cheese board that I would, under any other circumstances, enjoy tremendously. Blue cheeses are often too powerful or at least too salty to be included though there are certain mighty red that may hold their own in such company. Trust your taste, it cannot possibly let you down, if it tastes good to you it is good.
Fifth Course- Dessert. Even those without a sweet tooth will appreciate at least a little something to conclude a meal. The scope here is obviously endless and any attempt at a categorization of the possiblites is fruitless. There are a few things I consider, however. Foremost is wine; if I am lucky enough to be serving a dessert wine I will choose something that will compliment it. This first of all means that I will not serve a dessert sweeter than its accompanying wine, lest the wine, more delicate than solid food, be shown in a poor light. Secondly there are certain things to avoid: most wines will not tolerate chocolate and a frozen dessert will deaden one's enjoyment of a fine dessert wine. Another thing to consider is timing. It is interminable to be running around finishing endless last minute chores throughout the meal and by this point it is very satisfying to be able to simply pull out one's preprepared dish and serve it forth. Wines that accompany desserts are obviously sweet and there are several varieties, in a perfect world every meal would conclude with a fine Sauternes but in real life one may often make due with a less vaunted type, say a Coteaux de Layon or Muscat de Beaume-de-Venise. These are all delicious even if comparison between they and Sauternes, however unfair, is inevitable thanks to the tremendous amount of pleasure derived from sipping on a well-chilled glass of Sauternes. The flavors of almonds (and nuts in general), peaches and apples all compliment a Sauternes very well. True Sauternes is pricey so don't get down on yourself for not serving it everyday, just don't forget it for when you can justify the expense, I assure that the pleasure is more than worth it. Fortified wines I prefer to serve alone or with a simple cookie-like thing to accompany.
After dinner is a time for coffee and brandy or liqueurs. A cup of strong coffee and a tiny glass of eau-de-vie is a stunning conclusion.
No comments:
Post a Comment